1.009 | Lotus Exos 125 Stage 1 |
1.062 | Lotus 98T |
1.082 | Lotus Exos 125 |
1.160 | Mazda 787B |
1.173 | Mercedes-Benz C9 1989 LM |
1.176 | McLaren P1 |
1.181 | Pagani Zonda R |
1.184 | Ferrari 599XX EVO |
1.185 | Ferrari La Ferrari |
1.200 | Ferrari 458 GT2 |
1.210 | Nissan GT-R GT3 |
1.211 | Corvette C7R |
1.215 | BMW M3 GT2 |
1.215 | McLaren MP4-12C GT3 |
1.219 | BMW Z4 GT3 |
1.220 | Formula Abarth |
1.222 | P4/5 Competizione model 2011 |
1.223 | Mercedes SLS AMG GT3 |
1.230 | Pagani Huayra |
1.244 | Ferrari 312T |
1.247 | Lotus Evora GTC |
1.256 | Ferrari 458 Italia Stage 3 |
1.258 | McLaren F1 GTR |
1.259 | Lotus Evora GX |
1.299 | Lotus Type 49 |
1.333 | Ferrari F40 Stage 3 |
1.343 | Alfa Romeo 155 TI V6 |
1.350 | Mercedes-Benz 190E EVO II |
1.357 | BMW M3 E92 drift |
1.360 | BMW M235i Racing |
1.361 | BMW M3 E30 DTM |
1.371 | Ferrari 458 Italia |
1.380 | RUF CTR Yellowbird |
1.385 | McLaren MP4-12C |
1.391 | BMW Z4 E89 Drift |
1.399 | Lotus Evora GTE Carbon |
1.400 | Ferrari F40 |
1.408 | Lotus 2 Eleven GT4 |
1.410 | Mercedes SLS AMG |
1.411 | BMW M3 E30 Group A |
1.412 | KTM X-Bow R |
1.418 | Lotus 2 Eleven |
1.420 | Lotus Exige S |
1.432 | Shelby Cobra 427 S/C |
1.436 | Lotus Exige 240R Stage3 |
1.436 | Lotus Evora S Stage 2 |
1.446 | Lotus Exige V6 CUP |
1.446 | Lotus Exige S roadster |
1.450 | BMW M3 E92 Step1 |
1.453 | Alfa Romeo 4C |
1.456 | Lotus Evora GTE |
1.456 | BMW M3 E92 |
1.458 | BMW 1M Stage 3 |
1.475 | BMW 1M |
1.482 | Lotus Evora S |
1.499 | Lotus Elise SC |
1.502 | Lotus Exige 240R |
1.504 | Lotus Elise SC Step2 |
1.508 | Lotus Elise SC Step1 |
1.509 | Lotus Exige Scura |
1.525 | BMW Z4 E89 Step1 |
1.526 | BMW Z4 E89 |
1.547 | BMW M3 E30 Step1 |
1.560 | BMW M3 E30 |
1.568 | Giulietta QV |
1.571 | Alfa Romeo GTA |
1.596 | Abarth 500 EsseEsse Step1 |
1.600 | Giulietta QV Launch Edition 2014 |
1.601 | Abarth 500 EsseEsse |
2.353 | BMW M3 E30 Drift |
Im pretty sure some cars have got slower since v1.1 so its always a bit tricky using RSR times. For example the e30 DTM has got about 3 seconds per lap slower then earlier builds likely to balance the dtm series. Other cars get changed on some updates but its cool to have this list as a ballpark to see what can likely be raced together.
Interesting the 98T trumps the Exos S1! :o 8)
surly this is a work in progress? I mean, it's missing a major marque....If you can get the RSR guys to include it in their rank, we're good to go!
Robin- Reliant.
I think the way Wally does it is accurate which we have seen when pitting different cars against each other.What standard deviation? I don't use that anywhere.
Just out of curiosity, what happens Wally when you use data that lies at 2 standard deviations from the average, as opposed to 3? I'm wondering whether that would be more representative of the regular user while still getting the most out of the car?
I think the way Wally does it is accurate which we have seen when pitting different cars against each other.What standard deviation? I don't use that anywhere.
Just out of curiosity, what happens Wally when you use data that lies at 2 standard deviations from the average, as opposed to 3? I'm wondering whether that would be more representative of the regular user while still getting the most out of the car?
I think the way Wally does it is accurate which we have seen when pitting different cars against each other.What standard deviation? I don't use that anywhere.
Just out of curiosity, what happens Wally when you use data that lies at 2 standard deviations from the average, as opposed to 3? I'm wondering whether that would be more representative of the regular user while still getting the most out of the car?
Oh, I assumed you were using variance and standard deviation calculations for most things, eg. 68% for consistency = 1 Standard deviation, 95% = 3 SD. >68%<95% = 2 SD.